Re:Where our economy is, for the young
by throwaway0a5e on Friday October 02, 2020 @11:20AM
(#24663531)
>I would argue that as long as you are working, you have a real job.
If you're working nights in a warehouse while you finish your degree that will get you into an industry with nearly six figure starting salaries then I would argue that you're not "working yet" you're just a student with income.
What does salary have to do if somethings a "real job"?
Or what about blue collar workers who aren't going to school, and are at that same warehouse? Are they not working at a real job?
Re:Where our economy is, for the young
by throwaway0a5e on Friday October 02, 2020 @06:24PM
(#24667657)
Salary has nothing to do with it. Finishing one's education for the foreseeable future has everything to do with it.
Re:Where our economy is, for the young
by Shared404 on Saturday October 03, 2020 @03:26PM
(#24674130)
I've thought about this for a while now, and for the purposes of this discussion I agree.
That being the case, I think that the study would be best off tracking those 18-30 who are living individually and are not attending school. Thoughts?
Re:Where our economy is, for the young
by throwaway0a5e on Saturday October 03, 2020 @09:19PM
(#24675938)
Yeah that would be ideal but that's much harder for the people doing the study than just picking an age.
I won't argue that one, but where do you draw the line with
> have no real job yet
I would argue that as long as you are working, you have a real job.
Probably the best would be to track both 25-30 and 18-30 and see how it changes.