Re:USB-C was supposed to simplify our lives, but instead it’...
by JAlexoid on Thursday October 01, 2020 @10:41AM
(#24651347)
I found that Switch cannot use Apple's charger with the dock. It literally complains about the cable being wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:USB-C was supposed to simplify our lives, but instead it’...
by ulucs on Thursday October 01, 2020 @11:06AM
(#24651724)
The dock is a special case and requires some specific voltage/amperage support. But the switch itself abides by EU regulations.
Re:USB-C was supposed to simplify our lives, but instead it’...
by CamperBob2 on Thursday October 01, 2020 @07:37PM
(#24657329)
Yeah, there's always a "special case" with USB-C, isn't there.
Re:USB-C was supposed to simplify our lives, but instead it’...
by JAlexoid on Thursday October 01, 2020 @12:59PM
(#24653335)
65W Apple charger.... My Lenovo 65W USB-C charger had no issues at all.
Re:USB-C was supposed to simplify our lives, but instead it’...
by univerio on Thursday October 01, 2020 @01:59PM
(#24654109)
The Switch dock requires the 15V PD profile, which the (old) 61W adapter from 2016 did not support, but the newer 61W adapter from 2018 does.
Re:USB-C was supposed to simplify our lives, but instead it’...
by novok on Thursday October 01, 2020 @01:19PM
(#24653595)
A USB-C PD brink specifies which voltage and amp combos it supports charging, and the one that the dock & switch ask for as their 'optimal' power profiles most apple USB-C bricks do not deliver, despite having the wattage capability for them.
Re:USB-C was supposed to simplify our lives, but instead it’...
by jonny_eh on Thursday October 01, 2020 @11:22AM
(#24651931)
There's this third party portable dock that can help
Re:USB-C was supposed to simplify our lives, but instead it’...
by floatingatoll on Thursday October 01, 2020 @11:16AM
(#24651848)
Which of Apple’s chargers? Each of them has different power capabilities.