Re:Students Left Behind by Remote Learning
by auganov on Thursday October 01, 2020 @07:49AM
(#24649837)
Went to mostly private schools in America and my home country and none of them were anything like this. I've seen some violence back home but not physical. Alcohol, drugs, general bad behavior etc were a much bigger problem and definitely the worst at one public school I briefly went to.
In every school I'd say like people hung out with like people. So the "popularity" would be limited to that in-group. Most of people who PG would call "nerds" had a clique of their own as far as I could tell.
Some people might have been broadly disliked though.
Re:Students Left Behind by Remote Learning
by chaosite on Thursday October 01, 2020 @06:24AM
(#24649338)
it's not just a US specific thing, it's a generation specific thing.
The scenarios described in the GP link is a very late 70s-80s (Gen X) thing. 90s and early 00s high-schoolers had somewhat different experiences, but they know the trope since that's what was in movies. Schools today have a different concept of a "pecking order" - it's not that nerds aren't at the bottom anymore, it's that the whole concept changed.
Re:Students Left Behind by Remote Learning
by pnutjam on Thursday October 01, 2020 @09:12AM
(#24650435)
Physical violence is down, it's moved to emotional and psychological attacks, which can be just as bad or worse.
This is just judging from my own experience, and my kids have a very different set of circumstances then I did.
The very concept of 'popularity' is completely foreign to my experience. I don't think there was a thing such as a popular kid when I was at school or high school.
I personally enjoyed a lot going to school because I could spend time with my friends. I have never witnessed any violence apart from fights form time to time between two malse wanting to show who the strongest was. I was not in a privileged school.