Re:Study finds people have short-lived immunity to seasonal ...
by s1artibartfast on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @01:24PM
(#24630504)
I don't think this contradicts what the parent post said. There may be consequences, but the current status is unlikely to stay in perpetuity. People are not willing to socially distance for the remainder of their lives, even considering the risk of death and major side-effects.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Study finds people have short-lived immunity to seasonal ...
by mmm_grayons on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @05:23PM
(#24633170)
This is correct, and why I began by stating that this wasn't a normative statement. I wasn't passing judgement on whether or not they ought to continue precautionary measures, I was simply stating that I don't believe they will continue.
Re:Study finds people have short-lived immunity to seasonal ...
by jdavis703 on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @03:15PM
(#24631769)
There’s a big difference between social isolation (no state is doing this right now), and implementing harm reduction policies (e.g. outdoor gyms.)
Re:Study finds people have short-lived immunity to seasonal ...
by s1artibartfast on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @03:29PM
(#24631914)
What are you trying to say? Again, what does this have to do with the parent post?