Re:Fun Yet Effective Meetings
by usrusr on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @03:57AM
(#24625170)
One argument that I could imagine (not sure that I'm supporting it) to prefer slack over mail: usage patterns for a shared email channel are far more individual than for a branded async medium like slack. With mail, some people will do elaborate filtering, others just dump everything in a single inbox. Some will use mail very close to real-time (perhaps even do all their mail hands-off through some Siri/Alexa/whatever voice interface?), others might maximise asynchronicity even to the point of hardcopies. A branded channel will be far more predictable in terms of client UI and usage patterns.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fun Yet Effective Meetings
by bryanrasmussen on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @04:20AM
(#24625280)
>usage patterns for a shared email channel are far more individual than for a branded async medium like slack
on the other hand this can also be argued as a strength of email (which is what I would do) because different people need different usage patterns to work optimally, by forcing people into a one size fits all solution you will ensure some people will work less well than others.
Just invoke accessibility as an implicit benefit of the multitude of email usage possibilities and slack etc should be almost taboo.
Re:Fun Yet Effective Meetings
by bryanrasmussen on Thursday October 08, 2020 @08:29AM
(#24718491)
which companies that care so much about accessibility is it that you've been working at?