Re:CRDTs are the future
by thesuitonym on Monday September 28, 2020 @02:06PM
(#24619540)
Even better, just use the abbr tag. It's well supported and doesn't rely on an outside source to tell your readers what you're talking about.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
“It’s well supported”, yet on latest mobile Safari, it doesn’t appear to work at all. This w3 demo code does not show me the full name anywhere in the rendered content -https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_ab...
Chrome on Android rather (un)helpfully selects 'The WHO' and gives me a link to the rock band.
Re:CRDTs are the future
by justusthane on Monday September 28, 2020 @05:25PM
(#24621386)
That would have nothing to do with the HTML abbr tag. That’s just Google Assistant being Google Assistant.
Understood. It's a bit like the Google Assistant saying, 'Stand aside, I don't need the instructions. I'm being helpful.' And then doing the wrong thing. It should just RTFM.
Re:CRDTs are the future
by ficklepickle on Monday September 28, 2020 @03:07PM
(#24620176)
What about a long-press on the abbreviation? Does that do anything? I'm not on mobile now but I vaguely recall that working on some mobile platforms.
Re:CRDTs are the future
by lucasverra on Monday September 28, 2020 @04:00PM
(#24620679)
Noup, just tried
Although it works on desktop Safari, there's no way to tell that you should be able to hover over it.
Relevant to the parent here, I prefer to use a link because it is more commonly expected and it gives me the opportunity to refer to a quality source for an in-depth explanation of what I'm referencing.
It is especially useful when writing a technical document that utilizes multiple products/stacks/terms. Creating links to quality sources for those items gives someone new to the content a good source to go deeper into those pieces while allowing me to focus the article on the specific aspect I'm writing about.
This is how you do that:
Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (<a href="...">CRDT</a>)
...then you use "CRDT" for the rest of the document.
Re:CRDTs are the future
by JeremyBanks on Monday September 28, 2020 @02:11PM
(#24619591)
Merely expanding an abbreviation is less useful than explaining it.
Better in some ways, worse in others. Better than either, I think, is both.
Wow, that's awesome! Thanks for the tip!
A lot of people seem to be questioning why you'd need this when you could just provide a full link. Personally I read a lot of technical documentation and having acronyms written out in full would almost always be enough. Otherwise the whole document is likely over my head, or it's just a bad acronym.
Re:CRDTs are the future
by heavyset_go on Monday September 28, 2020 @03:08PM
(#24620178)
Does <abbr> work well on Android and iOS?
Re:CRDTs are the future
by californical on Monday September 28, 2020 @03:30PM
(#24620376)
Not working for me on iOS
Re:CRDTs are the future
by heavenlyblue on Monday September 28, 2020 @04:02PM
(#24620693)
It doesn’t work on mobile