News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CRDTs are the future by thesuitonym on Monday September 28, 2020 @02:06PM (#24619540)
Even better, just use the abbr tag. It's well supported and doesn't rely on an outside source to tell your readers what you're talking about.
Re:CRDTs are the future by taywrobel on Monday September 28, 2020 @02:29PM (#24619809)
“It’s well supported”, yet on latest mobile Safari, it doesn’t appear to work at all. This w3 demo code does not show me the full name anywhere in the rendered content -https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_ab...
Re:CRDTs are the future by hashtekar on Monday September 28, 2020 @04:30PM (#24620918)
Chrome on Android rather (un)helpfully selects 'The WHO' and gives me a link to the rock band.
Re:CRDTs are the future by justusthane on Monday September 28, 2020 @05:25PM (#24621386)
That would have nothing to do with the HTML abbr tag. That’s just Google Assistant being Google Assistant.
Re:CRDTs are the future by hashtekar on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @01:39AM (#24624464)
Understood. It's a bit like the Google Assistant saying, 'Stand aside, I don't need the instructions. I'm being helpful.' And then doing the wrong thing. It should just RTFM.
Re:CRDTs are the future by ficklepickle on Monday September 28, 2020 @03:07PM (#24620176)
What about a long-press on the abbreviation? Does that do anything? I'm not on mobile now but I vaguely recall that working on some mobile platforms.
Re:CRDTs are the future by lucasverra on Monday September 28, 2020 @04:00PM (#24620679)
Noup, just tried
Re:CRDTs are the future by snazz on Monday September 28, 2020 @04:16PM (#24620799)
Although it works on desktop Safari, there's no way to tell that you should be able to hover over it.
Re:CRDTs are the future by agent86 on Monday September 28, 2020 @03:23PM (#24620319)
Relevant to the parent here, I prefer to use a link because it is more commonly expected and it gives me the opportunity to refer to a quality source for an in-depth explanation of what I'm referencing.

It is especially useful when writing a technical document that utilizes multiple products/stacks/terms. Creating links to quality sources for those items gives someone new to the content a good source to go deeper into those pieces while allowing me to focus the article on the specific aspect I'm writing about.

Re:CRDTs are the future by rhizome on Monday September 28, 2020 @07:48PM (#24622544)
This is how you do that:

    Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (<a href="...">CRDT</a>)
...then you use "CRDT" for the rest of the document.
Re:CRDTs are the future by JeremyBanks on Monday September 28, 2020 @02:11PM (#24619591)
Merely expanding an abbreviation is less useful than explaining it.
Re:CRDTs are the future by dllthomas on Monday September 28, 2020 @02:19PM (#24619701)
Better in some ways, worse in others. Better than either, I think, is both.
Re:CRDTs are the future by dguest on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @02:59AM (#24624853)
Wow, that's awesome! Thanks for the tip!

A lot of people seem to be questioning why you'd need this when you could just provide a full link. Personally I read a lot of technical documentation and having acronyms written out in full would almost always be enough. Otherwise the whole document is likely over my head, or it's just a bad acronym.

Re:CRDTs are the future by heavyset_go on Monday September 28, 2020 @03:08PM (#24620178)
Does <abbr> work well on Android and iOS?
Re:CRDTs are the future by californical on Monday September 28, 2020 @03:30PM (#24620376)
Not working for me on iOS
Re:CRDTs are the future by heavenlyblue on Monday September 28, 2020 @04:02PM (#24620693)
It doesn’t work on mobile
Re:CRDTs are the future by mcculley on Monday September 28, 2020 @04:27PM (#24620887)
Do both!