News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber secures right to continue operating in London by dx034 on Monday September 28, 2020 @07:53AM (#24615627)
Or business expenses. Black cabs still tend to get you to your destination faster than Uber. They're faster to hail (at least in busy areas), can often use bus lanes and have more knowledge of the city. Their pricing is insane but I've never had an Uber that could beat a black cab.
Re:Uber secures right to continue operating in London by iso1631 on Monday September 28, 2020 @11:34AM (#24617738)
> can often use bus lanes

Indeed, that should be banned right off, but as you astutely point out, rich people want to get around faster than the rest of us.

Re:Uber secures right to continue operating in London by C1sc0cat on Monday September 28, 2020 @12:26PM (#24618366)
Why? Its not like bus lanes are exactly overflowing with traffic would you ban cyclists from bus lanes as well.
Re:Uber secures right to continue operating in London by iso1631 on Monday September 28, 2020 @01:10PM (#24618886)
You could let teslas in bus lanes and they wouldn't be overflowing with traffic, that's hardly the point. Bus lanes should be for vehicles that add very little to congestion, either because of the number of people transported (as in the case of a bus), or because of the size of the vehicle (bikes, motorbikes, e-scooters).

Black cabs (and ubers) have an effective occupancy even lower than private cars.

Re:Uber secures right to continue operating in London by C1sc0cat on Monday September 28, 2020 @01:29PM (#24619115)
A lot of cab and uber use in London is groups not just singletons - its cheaper for 3 or 4 people to use a back cab or uber for short journeys than use the tube
Re:Uber secures right to continue operating in London by iso1631 on Monday September 28, 2020 @01:58PM (#24619445)
So allow high occupancy vehicles (say at least 3 passengers, 4 for taxis) in bus lanes.