News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads fro... by tooltalk on Monday September 28, 2020 @03:12AM (#24613812)
>> ... being banned essentially on executive whim:

The US Senate unanimously approved a bill banning federal employees from using TikTok on government-issued devices last month. So there is some consensus among lawmakers that some sort of privacy and/or security threat exists -- it's hardly on "executive whim."

Re:Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads fro... by howlgarnish on Monday September 28, 2020 @04:02AM (#24614167)
You're tautologically correct (TikTok is banned because TikTok is banned!), but that still doesn't answer the question. Put another way: if whatever Tiktok is doing represents a categorical privacy/security threat, then why aren't they banning all apps that engage in said activity, instead of just Tiktok?

I suspect the answer is that Tiktok is just doing the same as Facebook etc, and that's unacceptable only because the mined data might go to China.

Re:Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads fro... by gabaix on Monday September 28, 2020 @05:39AM (#24614797)
It is quite likely the US will continue to look at companies on which CCP can have control over. I agree it is odd to not have made a more comprehensive list.
Re:Judge temporarily blocks U.S. ban on TikTok downloads fro... by lowiqengineer on Monday September 28, 2020 @07:57AM (#24615655)
Those two examples are fundamentally different and it’s silly to conflate individual action with coercing the app stores to discontinue supporting the app.