Re:Hotel guest in Thailand jailed for defamation after posti...
by rsynnott on Sunday September 27, 2020 @07:27PM
(#24611105)
Truth is an absolute defense to libel in the UK. And pretty much everywhere else in Europe, AFAIK.
Some European countries do have quite strict privacy laws, so a newspaper which obtained the material in a questionable way might have to be cautious (see the News International hacking scandal, for instance).
Re:Hotel guest in Thailand jailed for defamation after posti...
by AmericanChopper on Sunday September 27, 2020 @06:57PM
(#24610889)
> For example, a British Lord's Nazi fetish
What case was this? Are you sure you're not talking about the Max Mosley (the former racing driver/FIA boss) case against News Group? Because that was a breach of privacy case, not a defamation one.
Re:Hotel guest in Thailand jailed for defamation after posti...
by gamblor956 on Sunday September 27, 2020 @07:31PM
(#24611127)
No, the other case happened around the same time or earlier but involved a member of the House of Lords with a fetish for Nazi-themed swingers' orgies.
It was a huge deal for a few weeks, and then it disappeared. I only remember it because my Torts professor brought it up in class during the defamation lecture as an example of the differences between US and UK defamation law.
In the US, the publication of private matters is a separate tort, invasion of privacy. For IOP, truth is not a defense.
Or another way of looking at it: libel is a narrower tort in the US than it is in the rest of the world.