Re:Are we living at the 'hinge of history'?
by megameter on Sunday September 27, 2020 @09:09PM
(#24611831)
From this you could then make the case for instability in the current developed-world being a healthy phenomenon. Which is a nice thought if true.
Re:Are we living at the 'hinge of history'?
by eru on Monday September 28, 2020 @12:26AM
(#24612949)
The argument cuts both ways:
Early tyrannical states and back-breaking agriculture outcompeted relatively free and comfortable hunter gatherers.
Re:Are we living at the 'hinge of history'?
by simonh on Monday September 28, 2020 @06:08AM
(#24614980)
That only works if there is an open neighbour. If we end up with authoritarian control being ubiquitous, as potentially with a victory by the axis powers, or the success of global Communism, there wouldn't be any open neighbours to compete with.
East Germany vs West Germany; North Korea vs South Korea - and that's in less than a century. On a longer timescale, think Ming and Qing dynasties compared to Europe on the same timeframe - China was much more stable during that time, but stability was not sufficient in the long run. However, the current PRC is perhaps a counterexample, though there is a lot of nuance, external conditions and multiple very different approaches that the China leadership tried out during the last 50 years.