News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by drbojingle on Saturday September 26, 2020 @05:24PM (#24602258)
I'm expecting MS/linux in 5 years or less and I think WSL is the first step.
Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by thesuperbigfrog on Sunday September 27, 2020 @12:01AM (#24604133)
A Microsoft Linux distribution would be very interesting.

Maybe PowerShell would be the default command-line interface.

VS Code would be the default text editor.

.NET Core programming languages would be in the default SDK with the ability to seamlessly develop applications and push to Azure.

They could even include a way to run legacy Windows applications to maintain backward compatibility with all the previous Windows applications--a Windows subsystem for Linux.

Seriously though, if Microsoft created a full desktop Linux distro I would definitely want to try it.

Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by SSLy on Sunday September 27, 2020 @06:32AM (#24605645)
>Maybe PowerShell would be the default command-line interface.

You have no idea how much stuff expects the shell to behave like bourne shell.

Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by thesuperbigfrog on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @02:50AM (#24624801)
>> You have no idea how much stuff expects the shell to behave like bourne shell.

Would you please elaborate what you mean by this statement?

The C shell (csh / tcsh) and the Korn shell (ksh) don't follow Bourne shell conventions and yet they work fine as login shells and script interpreters.

It seems logical that PowerShell could be further adapted to be more Unix-like with "read" and "print" functions that would attempt to bridge the object / plaintext divide similar to the "read" and "print" functions that are used in Lisp-like languages to convert between Lisp-like forms and plaintext.

Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by pier25 on Saturday September 26, 2020 @09:00PM (#24603377)
You mean like a Linux distro with Windows desktop environment?
Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by drbojingle on Monday September 28, 2020 @05:39PM (#24621503)
pretty much.
Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by jdc on Saturday September 26, 2020 @05:36PM (#24602357)
Other than the license and ecosystem, isn't the Windows kernel broadly superior?
Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by sidecut on Saturday September 26, 2020 @05:49PM (#24602445)
Microsoft already has a Linux kernel. https://github.com/microsoft/WSL2-Linux-Kernel

If it were superior for containers, Windows containers wouldn't have withered on the vine.

.NET Core being truly cross-platform is pretty much an official acknowledgement by Microsoft that Windows is not the be-all and end-all. To use their words, they're "meeting developers where they live" instead of insisting that one size fits all, if that size is Windows.

Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by userspacethread on Saturday September 26, 2020 @05:46PM (#24602428)
This is an interesting claim, is there something I can read in support of it?

Having worked with the Linux OS APIs and Win32 APIs, they both seem to have their advantages.

Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by Lammy on Saturday September 26, 2020 @07:02PM (#24602828)
Without a userland or application ecosystem how could one even say?
Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by drbojingle on Monday September 28, 2020 @05:39PM (#24621508)
superior how?
Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by fomine3 on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @09:42PM (#24634987)
I expect it is now called Ubuntu.
Re:WSL Getting GUI Support by drbojingle on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @01:20PM (#24641149)
If MS owns, funds, and brands it then sure.