News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by willis936 on Saturday September 26, 2020 @07:49AM (#24598058)
I don’t know what battery pinephones source, but I am under the impression that all smartphone batteries have a battery management IC that handles safety hard limits internally. Lithium ion inherently needs a lot of care in charging and discharging. You can get lithium ion batteries without smarts attached for RC planes and cars, but those are known to catch fire often since they’re driven so hard :).

These battery management ICs will permanently shut down the battery off above a dangerous temperature threshold. Better to kill a battery than to risk a fire.

Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by squarefoot on Saturday September 26, 2020 @10:26AM (#24599086)
> I don’t know what battery pinephones source

From the Pinephone wiki: "Battery: Lithium-ion, rated capacity 2800mAh (10.64Wh), typical capacity 3000mAh (11.40Wh) (nominally replaceable with any Samsung J7 form-factor battery)"

I guess they're sourcing unmarked Samsung compatible batteries which should be all protected, where should equals to 99.999%.

If that's the case, then there's no way malicious software or even firmware could damage it. The protection in those batteries is implemented hardware level; the chip contained in the cell will cut off its connection if it detects either an excessive discharge current (to avoid potential explosion), excessive voltage discharge (to avoid chemical degradation and subsequent charging attempts related dangers), excessive temperature (again to avoid explosion), excessive charging current (... explosion). They are all detected outside of system control, so no need for panic.

Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by megous on Monday September 28, 2020 @10:29PM (#24623649)
Define excessive discharge. In-battery circuit kicks in at 6-8A. Battery is specced for max 1.4A continuous charge/discharge current. With the safety margins in these things, it will probably take 2-3A continuously, too. But can it take 4A for 1 hour? Wanna try?

Also, there's no protection against excessive temperature in the battery protection circuit's specification, so not sure where you're taking your information from. It would be nice if people actually used the datasheets that are freely available, since Pinephone is mostly open HW, instead of proclaiming random generalities.

Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by numpad0 on Saturday September 26, 2020 @09:34AM (#24598713)
Those chips on the packs are last resort safety, not something to be relied upon daily as charge controllers.
Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by willis936 on Saturday September 26, 2020 @09:57AM (#24598893)
Certainly not. That is what the PMIC is for. It’s up to the developers to responsibly configure the PMIC and that is a real hazard. However, the safety situation might not be as bad the author makes it out to be. I don’t know any better though, and it is always a good idea to know when it comes to safety. It’s an important topic to shine the light on.
Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by numpad0 on Saturday September 26, 2020 @10:14AM (#24599013)
The author also mentions LCD damage from SoC heat. Could it lead to a runaway from that side?

Last time I read about PinePhone, the topic was kill switches hardwired to chip enable pins that also make it impossible to sleep peripherals from main SoC. That was only “weird but okay”, but personally, with this discussions going, this phone and associated ROMs aren’t something I consider anymore.

Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by jpgvm on Saturday September 26, 2020 @09:52AM (#24598862)
For RC cars/aircraft etc those are usually incredibly high current LiPo chemistry and wired in series to deliver much higher voltage. The LiIon chemistry used in electronics on the other hand is quite pedestrian and packs are constructed with lower peak current and voltage output.

Despite similarity in name they are very different beasts. I'm not all that afraid of a LiIon pack unless it's been sorely mistreated or is a huge EV pack or something. On the other hand I treat LiPos with the utmost respect and get them far away from anything at the first sign of bloating or accidental shorting.

Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by StavrosK on Saturday September 26, 2020 @12:55PM (#24600257)
Yeah, getting your wire cutter arc-welded to the cable because you accidentally touched it to both ends of a LiPo is... fun.
Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by qchris on Saturday September 26, 2020 @01:47PM (#24600674)
I would love to see a write-up and pictures of that incident. I think a lot of people, probably myself included, don't always give them the respect they deserve, and that would be a really neat story/visual to drive the point home.

Obviously, no pressure, but figured I'd express the interest

Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by StavrosK on Saturday September 26, 2020 @01:49PM (#24600695)
It's much less interesting than it sounds, I was cutting the connector off to solder on a new one, and the first wire accidentally touched for a moment while I was cutting the second one. There was a huge spark and a big mark on the cutter.
Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by Inhibit on Saturday September 26, 2020 @09:19AM (#24598608)
That's usually the case in the battery packs. Looks like I'll be ripping apart my battery when I get around to taking out the Pinephone.
Re:Let's talk about safety of Pinephone by solarkraft on Saturday September 26, 2020 @08:35AM (#24598334)
> Lithium ion inherently needs a lot of care in charging and discharging.

For longevity this is true, but even the while overcharging the risk of a fire isn't that high nowadays (from what I've seen close to 0 with cylindrical cells). Some pouch cells are even fine when punctured.

Of course I want these issues to be fixed to keep Pinephones working and AFAIK the batteries in the Pinephone are of an older model, so maybe they're a bit more dangerous. The author definitely has a point.