Re:Boulder prohibits gatherings of any size for 18-22 year olds
by scotty79 on Friday September 25, 2020 @09:39AM
(#24589567)
Student are "driving" bioreactors that can easily start manufacturing bioweapon and spread it around. Some responsibility must be imposed if the one they assumed themselves was insufficient.
Re:Boulder prohibits gatherings of any size for 18-22 year olds
by ardy42 on Friday September 25, 2020 @12:10PM
(#24591298)
> Your analogy is just bad. Closer would be banning all drivers between a certain age rubric because possibly, maybe, some of them will get drunk and drive.
You know we already ban all drivers "between a certain age rubric"? Try to get your driver's license from age 0-15.
Re:Boulder prohibits gatherings of any size for 18-22 year olds
by shadowprofile77 on Saturday September 26, 2020 @02:48AM
(#24596918)
I was referring to adult drivers or at least those with more or less adult faculties and physiology (and in some rural areas depending on country, farm and country driving for younger 12 to 15 year old's is definitely tolerated or even conditionally legal.) Now you're just entering absurdity by comparing my previous comment to bans on drivers so young that half the ages you mention couldn't even reach a brake pedal in a normal car.
Your analogy is just bad. Closer would be banning all drivers between a certain age rubric because possibly, maybe, some of them will get drunk and drive.
If anybody proposed that, it would be rightly derided, but here with politically motivated COVID panic based on still poorly understood evidence is somehow making this absurd restriction seem okay to an awful lot of people right here on HN.