News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation by majormajor on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @05:01PM (#24571988)
> I'd think people who operate in a realm where text becomes action executed by a machine designed wholly around faithful, reliable execution of text fed to it would come to learn the reality-defining power of rules.

Ah, but don't forget how often the code that gets written doesn't do exactly what the writer expected! Or is exploited by another party...

Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation by shadowgovt on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @05:14PM (#24572124)
Indeed. I wouldn't say the law is for show; I would say the written law isn't the whole story. Reality is a three-edged sword: the law, the intent, and the implementation.

"For show," to me, implies you can ignore it and charge forward, bull-in-a-china-shop-style. That doesn't work in law or computers; naive invalid input gets rejected by the first-stage parser, and a court complaint completely ignorant of the law can get tossed by the clerk before it even sees a judge's desk. Rather, hacking is understanding and exploiting the consequences of, and nuances within, the rules.

Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation by bilegeek on Thursday September 24, 2020 @12:00AM (#24575113)
This is my first time seeing a Babylon 5 reference in the wild. Well said.
Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation by tomcam on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @07:54PM (#24573696)
Username strangely appropriate
Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation by shadowgovt on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @08:21PM (#24573896)
I can highly recommend the discography of They Might Be Giants. ;)
Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation by tomcam on Friday September 25, 2020 @10:44PM (#24596020)
That is always a solid recommendation