Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation
by shadowgovt on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @05:14PM
(#24572124)
Indeed. I wouldn't say the law is for show; I would say the written law isn't the whole story. Reality is a three-edged sword: the law, the intent, and the implementation.
"For show," to me, implies you can ignore it and charge forward, bull-in-a-china-shop-style. That doesn't work in law or computers; naive invalid input gets rejected by the first-stage parser, and a court complaint completely ignorant of the law can get tossed by the clerk before it even sees a judge's desk. Rather, hacking is understanding and exploiting the consequences of, and nuances within, the rules.
Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation
by bilegeek on Thursday September 24, 2020 @12:00AM
(#24575113)
This is my first time seeing a Babylon 5 reference in the wild. Well said.
Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation
by tomcam on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @07:54PM
(#24573696)
Username strangely appropriate
Re:DOJ unveils proposed Section 230 legislation
by shadowgovt on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @08:21PM
(#24573896)
I can highly recommend the discography of They Might Be Giants. ;)
Ah, but don't forget how often the code that gets written doesn't do exactly what the writer expected! Or is exploited by another party...