Re:Roughly 2000 blogs running on a $7/month dyno
by psychometry on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @09:37AM
(#24566889)
I'm literally talking about the difference between 7 and 14 dollars per month.
Re:Roughly 2000 blogs running on a $7/month dyno
by _verandaguy on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @09:38AM
(#24566904)
Which, for some people, is significant.
Re:Roughly 2000 blogs running on a $7/month dyno
by nogabebop23 on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @10:13AM
(#24567288)
no one spending 7 dollars a month for a pure hobby would balk at spending $14. The difference is between nothing and anything.
Re:Roughly 2000 blogs running on a $7/month dyno
by dvfjsdhgfv on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @10:26AM
(#24567440)
It's definitely not true. I bought several dozens of these in the last decade for various projects and the price was definitely an important factor for some of them (especially the ones that I hope to be running for decades).
Re:Roughly 2000 blogs running on a $7/month dyno
by shyn3 on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @10:36AM
(#24567588)
Seriously $7 for some people is the difference between eating for a week or not eating and without knowing where OP is it's hard to know.
Re:Roughly 2000 blogs running on a $7/month dyno
by peteradio on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @11:45AM
(#24568387)
Then why would he be spending $7 already on a hobby!??!
Re:Roughly 2000 blogs running on a $7/month dyno
by masukomi on Wednesday September 23, 2020 @01:07PM
(#24569292)
because "you have to spend money to make money" and building a resource people value for free despite the fact that you loose money, and then charging or asking for money is a proven technique for earning way more than $7 a month. It could be a financial stretch that has them on the edge, in hopes of earning a significant reward later.
Unless it's a hobby site offering a free service, which this seems to be.
Projects like this are awesome, and the barrier to making them should be low — gatekeeping by the community like this project needs to have a five nines SLA is frankly counterproductive.