Re:China sharply expands mass labor program in Tibet
by int_19h on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @01:17PM
(#24557220)
If US rejects colonialism, why doesn't Puerto Rico have voting representation in the federal government?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:China sharply expands mass labor program in Tibet
by tharne on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @01:40PM
(#24557524)
To be fair, if Puerto Rico wanted it's independence, the current administration would probably give it to them. Likewise, had they wanted to become the 51st state, I have no doubt that in 2009 President Obama and the Democratic super majority would have been happy to make that happen and grab up two extra Senate seats in the process.
The fact is, a lot Puerto Ricans like the current setup. The are natural born citizens who have full freedom of movement within the U.S. while Puerto Rico has fewer federal restrictions and obligations compared to a U.S. state.
Re:China sharply expands mass labor program in Tibet
by sangnoir on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @04:40PM
(#24559628)
> The fact is, a lot Puerto Ricans like the current setup. The are natural born citizens who have full freedom of movement within the U.S. while Puerto Rico has fewer federal restrictions and obligations compared to a U.S. state.
I think you have it reversed: Puerto Rico suffers from all of the federal obligations and has no states' rights to make up for it. No representative, no voting senator (and therefore no 'pork'). The burden of the federal restrictions were bared in the aftermath of the hurricane: the Jones Act meant relief could only be transported by American ships even as other countries stood ready to help.