News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Padlocks, Phishing and Privacy; the Value Proposition of ... by dcolkitt on Monday September 21, 2020 @11:44AM (#24544703)
1) I trust the privacy laws and their level of enforcement in certain foreign jurisdictions more than the US.

2) I trust a company who’s entire value proposition is privacy more than one who’s value proposition is having a monopoly on the local fiber.

Re:Padlocks, Phishing and Privacy; the Value Proposition of ... by falcolas on Monday September 21, 2020 @02:19PM (#24546657)
> who’s entire value proposition is privacy

I wouldn't believe any corporation who says this. A profile of a self-identified private person's traffic is likely worth a lot more than what a niche audience will pay for privacy.

VPNs have a history of lying about their business models, about how private their service really is. International contract enforcement won't exactly leave you with a lot of leverage if (pragmatically, when) they lie to you.

And merely being international certainly won't stop a state level actor who is intent on gaining access to your traffic.

Re:Padlocks, Phishing and Privacy; the Value Proposition of ... by pstrateman on Monday September 21, 2020 @12:34PM (#24545395)
Have you considered that their primary revenue stream is selling your data and not the fee you pay?

Many of the VPN providers are suspiciously cheap.

Re:Padlocks, Phishing and Privacy; the Value Proposition of ... by danShumway on Monday September 21, 2020 @01:37PM (#24546193)
Well, don't buy from a VPN provider that is suspiciously cheap.

If a no-name company starts selling suspiciously cheap smartphones, the odds of those smartphones being backdoored/stolen/broken goes up pretty dramatically. That doesn't mean that every company selling smartphones is equally untrustworthy.

Of course it's a problem how hard it is to tell if a VPN company is trustworthy, but that's a problem that exists for almost every 3rd-party relationship I enter into.