News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by omgwtfbyobbq on Saturday September 19, 2020 @03:00AM (#24525721)
That depends on how the court is packed, and how it functions after. It's possible that court packing could be seen as a success, even if each side alternates at packing, just because having many justices can minimize some of the court's current limitations.

https://time.com/5338689/supreme-court-packing/

To put it another way, the size of the House, Senate, and Presidency are determined by the constitution. The Judiciary is the only branch where it's size can be increased without a constitutional amendment, which could favor populism, regardless of who is in power, if it's expanded significantly.

Being as small as it is could speak to how the government has a tendency to concentrate/centralize power, even if it's relatively easy to spread that power out.

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by vlovich123 on Saturday September 19, 2020 @07:00AM (#24526572)
You are incorrect on one thing. The size of the House is not determined by constitution. The only things it guarantees are that there’s a census and that each state gets at least one.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by ncallaway on Saturday September 19, 2020 @10:52AM (#24527803)
It also demands that apportionment of representatives be according to the population of the states.

So, yes, the total number isn't fixed but the apportionment is.

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by vlovich123 on Saturday September 19, 2020 @08:48PM (#24531245)
if I recall correctly the specific rules for apportionment aren’t part of the constitution either are they?
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by omgwtfbyobbq on Saturday September 19, 2020 @01:31PM (#24529083)
Thank you for the correction.