News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by rayiner on Friday September 18, 2020 @10:13PM (#24524265)
The "conservative" National Review went back to every Supreme Court appointment in history and made charts showing exactly what happened to answer your question. The New York Times, with its "moral clarity" performed no such analysis and presented no such charts.

So no, I won't cite something else.

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by tchock23 on Saturday September 19, 2020 @04:21AM (#24526031)
Why put ‘conservative’ in quotes? If you Google the name of the magazine their own meta description says conservative as the second word, so they consider themselves a partisan source.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by conistonwater on Saturday September 19, 2020 @04:53AM (#24526134)
In English quotes can be ambiguous, in this case they mean it is a direct quote from the parent comment (for emphasis, basically), not that it's under suspicion.