News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ultra Safe Nuclear by agumonkey on Thursday September 17, 2020 @01:35PM (#24507509)
what about cultural changes ? serious question. less living at night, less energy consumption, making sun randomness a bit less of an issue. Just asking.
Re:Ultra Safe Nuclear by bob1029 on Thursday September 17, 2020 @04:28PM (#24509575)
Cultural changes don't fix the duck curve. Around 4-7 PM is when virtually everyone is running their HVAC the most. This is also where you are starting to lose most of your solar generation capacity. There is a solid 4-5 hours of thermal momentum that needs to be compensated for before everyone hits set point temperatures and units cycle off on the hottest days.

Unless you are proposing that we do away with basic comfort in many regions, or spend hundreds of billions of dollars tearing down every structure and re-engineering them for passive comfort, I do not think there is much choice other than to bring in more peak generation capacity or employ currently-infeasible grid scale storage.

Re:Ultra Safe Nuclear by Manfredo_1 on Thursday September 17, 2020 @03:04PM (#24508620)
By "cultural changes" you mean energy shortages. Realistically, this would most likely result in leaders getting elected out of office and resuming the use of fossil fuels. Regular blackouts are immensely unpopular.
Re:Ultra Safe Nuclear by evgen on Thursday September 17, 2020 @04:27PM (#24509560)
Those of us who lived through the oil shock in the 70s are having a laugh at the 'just cut the energy supply' path. Would love to hear from people who endured the UK at the height of their 3-day week to see how keen people were about this forced change...
Re:Ultra Safe Nuclear by agumonkey on Thursday September 17, 2020 @05:14PM (#24510046)
I think the context matters a lot:

- this was a brutal unplanned event

- people were still trying to reach higher comfort, psychologically unsettling