News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @03:26AM (#24490325)
> most of those senators are not the holders of truth when it comes to technology

They don’t have to be. Their staffers do.

I’ve worked with a number of staffers on these questions for about three years now. They’re some of the smartest people I’ve worked with in my career, which has centred around Wall Street and Silicon Valley.

Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by mondoshawan on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @03:35AM (#24490373)
So why aren't they the senators instead of the morons they back?
Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by Broken_Hippo on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @04:03AM (#24490541)
Because a senator should know how to listen to others. They cannot be an expert on everything. Heck, these folks are making rules about medicine, pollution, car safety, tech issues, teaching, school lunches, interstate highways, commerce, military, child toy standards, what sorts of meat to allow in, and lots of other things I can't think up off of the top of my head. No one can be an expert on all of them - why we would suddenly expect them all to be an expert on this is beyond me. IIRC, an education in law is pretty common, which would be expected.

(I know the system isn't perfect and not everyone listens to educated voices and in a perfect world, there would be a range of knowledge in the elected body itself).

Edited for a missed comma.

Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by doukdouk on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @08:34AM (#24491991)
I think you missed the point - representatives should be expert (at a minimum) in HN interests or come from the same demographics (better) as HN commentators. Anything else means they are "morons", to use the word of the previous commentator.
Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by mhh__ on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @03:57AM (#24490504)
You need to be a certain type of animal to be a successful politician. Especially in the US where the power per person in the senate especially is enormous.

The house of commons has 600 more MPs for 5x less population.

Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by HatchedLake721 on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @03:49AM (#24490464)
Because being smart is not a golden ticket or the only quality required to become a senator/politician.
Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by wasdfff on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @10:31AM (#24493048)
The staffer is a specialist. Intimate knowledge of highway infrastructure, or technology issues alone do not make a senator. A senator is someone who manages a small cabal of specialist experts who collectively hold more knowledge than any one head could ever fit. The job can’t be done by one person, its a coordinated team effort.
Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by qaq on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @03:36AM (#24490381)
would people actually vote for them?
Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by mhh__ on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @04:00AM (#24490514)
Combining brains and charisma is very rare in a politician. Obama being the textbook example - senior law school lecturer but also has the emotional depth and natural charm.
Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by wasdfff on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @10:34AM (#24493076)
I’d think the list is shorter of charismatic politicians who hadn’t gone to a top notch law school. Plenty use brains and charm. Even spineless hacks like Mitch McConnel know how to be charismatic around wealthy republicans, and are brilliant, just brilliantly evil.
Re:Google says it doesn't monopolize digital ad market – sen... by scarface74 on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @09:30AM (#24492502)
And he was accused of being a “secret Muslim” trying to bring Sharia law by a large percentage of the population.

That and trying to use the military to “takeover” Texas.