Re:Org-mode 9.4 is out. Can you help?
by iLemming on Monday September 14, 2020 @04:44PM
(#24474913)
Alright. Now, let's say everyone is busy, and the maintainers have no time to review the patch. Who's going to remember that someone sent an email with some improvements a few months later? AFAIK There's no easy way to find all the emails with patches that weren't merged/(not) accepted/upvoted/downvoted/closed/etc. It's not easy to refer to the specific email; it's difficult to pinpoint the exact conversation around a specific change using git-blame. GitHub/Gitlab/etc. make all that a lot simpler.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Org-mode 9.4 is out. Can you help?
by bananadonkey on Monday September 14, 2020 @07:38PM
(#24476386)
Reviewers possibly use org-mode to keep track of those things. Would be trivial if Emacs is their mail reader.
For those who are really taking advantage of org-agenda et al, I'd argue GitHub issue tracking UI is far more restrictive for tracking patches.
If I were in that position I'd be duplicating issues into org-mode anyway (or using an Emacs mode to interact with/sync them). Maybe that's the missing link?