Re:ARM: Can 'crown jewel' of UK technology be protected?
by LatteLazy on Monday September 14, 2020 @03:00PM
(#24473786)
I'm very confused. We sold this to the Japanese already!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ARM: Can 'crown jewel' of UK technology be protected?
by tyingq on Monday September 14, 2020 @03:07PM
(#24473867)
Yeah, I'm confused as well. SoftBank could have done things the UK didn't like. They've owned ARM since mid 2016.
Re:ARM: Can 'crown jewel' of UK technology be protected?
by dageshi on Monday September 14, 2020 @03:15PM
(#24473946)
Probably a couple reasons why it's coming up now. First the Japanese have a pretty good reputation as owners of UK businesses, they own quite a few Scotch distilleries and impressions are they manage things well.
Second, I think the world feels a lot more protectionist nowadays vs when the original buyout happened. I know it wasn't that long ago but the trade war tariffs between the US and China sort of set the tone.
Re:ARM: Can 'crown jewel' of UK technology be protected?
by toyg on Monday September 14, 2020 @03:37PM
(#24474193)
The level of anxiety about capital and industrial flight in the UK is also much higher due to Brexit.
Re:ARM: Can 'crown jewel' of UK technology be protected?
by mongol on Monday September 14, 2020 @03:19PM
(#24473998)
Sounds like the story with Volvo Cars. Ford sold it to Geely, but it was like it was sold to a foreign owner in the first place.
Re:ARM: Can 'crown jewel' of UK technology be protected?
by jariel on Monday September 14, 2020 @10:59PM
(#24477493)
SoftBank is a financial investor, bankers, so they can have influence, but it's more like having 'a single public investor' instead of a bunch of them.
NVIDIA is another ballgame entirely, it's a corporation in the space, meaning some kind of merger on some kind of scale.