Re:Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Reason Nat...
by ashtonkem on Monday September 14, 2020 @01:42PM
(#24472882)
That’s a cumbersome extra step for unclear benefit.
Yes, q is supposedly faster than jq. But it is exceedingly rare for me to ever have any performance problems with jq, especially since it’s essentially a one off utility I use occasionally, not as part of the hot loop of any workflow where performance matters.
Yes, q is supposedly faster than jq. But it is exceedingly rare for me to ever have any performance problems with jq, especially since it’s essentially a one off utility I use occasionally, not as part of the hot loop of any workflow where performance matters.