News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Reason Native/OCaml. Parent comment

Re:Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Reason Nat... by saagarjha on Monday September 14, 2020 @11:52AM (#24471614)
> no X11

XQuartz if you want it

> completely non-POSIX low-level API

macOS has a POSIX layer.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Reason Nat... by catblast on Monday September 14, 2020 @03:03PM (#24473821)
> XQuartz if you want it

There are X server implementations for Windows, Android, AmigaOS, Windows CE!!, etc... I don't think this is relevant.

> macOS has a POSIX layer. So do many systems, again including Windows in varying forms through the years. I think the salient issue is that BSD UNIX and "tradition" are conflicting. The point of the original CMU Mach project was to replace the BSD monolith kernel.

[ Parent | on HN ]