News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Reason Nat... by jeffbee on Monday September 14, 2020 @11:40AM (#24471438)
Yes, but the inputs to jq are not JSON, they are "a sequence of whitespace-separated JSON values which are passed through the provided filter one at a time" which is the relevant thing if you are going to try to replace jq.
Re:Q: A faster re-implementaiton of jq written in Reason Nat... by davesnx on Saturday September 19, 2020 @07:43AM (#24526761)
Yep, kind of.

The comma operations means that the "filters" are duplicated, so instead of one json state you would pass two if there's one coma; and ofcourse any number of commas are allowed.