Re:Portland adopts landmark facial recognition ordinances
by unishark on Friday September 11, 2020 @11:20PM
(#24449539)
> I don't think anyone would consider someone taking a picture in public to run afoul of this law.
I guarantee you someone will. But my point was about the first amendment being applicable to the topic of photography, not about a state law. And art was an example, not a definition of speech.
I don't think anyone would consider someone taking a picture in public to run afoul of this law.