News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by isatty on Friday September 11, 2020 @04:26PM (#24446980)
> build something that is scalable?

That's probably the point - 1:1 experiences that are not scalable is a drop in the bucket even if they charge a 30% commission.

Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by withinboredom on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:54PM (#24447751)
I beg to differ. I use a website to schedule our baby sitter, but with this rule, it's possible to be an app.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by _-___________-_ on Saturday September 12, 2020 @04:46AM (#24450959)
The baby sitter is a service delivered outside the platform, so just like Uber and the like, they already didn't have to use IAP. There are tons of similar apps on the App Store that already don't use IAP.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by rpdillon on Friday September 11, 2020 @06:09PM (#24447865)
Not to my reading. This rule only applies to real-time experiences.

> If your app enables the purchase of realtime person-to-person experiences between two individuals (for example tutoring students, medical consultations, real estate tours, or fitness training)...

Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by withinboredom on Friday September 11, 2020 @07:06PM (#24448267)
How would it not? It’s no different than tutoring. I pay the website a monthly fee (which probably needs to be an IAP) but the payment to the babysitter could continue as-is via bank transfer/ideal.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by rpdillon on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:43PM (#24449148)
Ah, I see. I was intersecting "real-time experience" with Apple's previous "digital goods" and thinking "real-time experience that happens digitally" (which tutoring students, medical consultations, real estate tours, or fitness training all can support), and I quickly wrote off babysitting as something that can't happen digitally. I'm much less confident now based on how you're reading it.
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by sheeshkebab on Friday September 11, 2020 @07:45PM (#24448534)
I think baby sitter type services are already allowed without iap - similar to Uber, etc
Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by Dylan16807 on Saturday September 12, 2020 @01:00AM (#24449966)
As long as you don't have two kids...