News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Security by obscurity is underrated by kstrauser on Friday September 11, 2020 @02:15PM (#24445660)
> I'm going to find whatever port your running ssh on if your running it.

I still think it's a good idea. With SSH on port 22, ten thousand bots plus an attacker try to hammer it (so says fail2ban). With SSH on port 9278, zero bots plus an attacker try to hammer it. By throwing away the 99.99% of the chaff, you can see the remaining wheat you care about.

Changing SSH ports isn't about saying "yep, we fixed it!" and calling it a day. It's about decreasing the amount of stuff you have to deal with, which is quite useful. It's something you can do in addition to everything else that gives a decent bang for its buck. No, it doesn't keep you out, but it does keep out those thousands of bots crawling around looking for an open 22 to pester.

Re:Security by obscurity is underrated by weare138 on Friday September 11, 2020 @06:53PM (#24448154)
But new people in the industry shouldn't think that the things recommended in the article should be used as a primary defense and are accepted industry practices. Moving SSH to a new port to reduce false security alerts is one thing, having people read that article and walk away thinking this is how we do things is another. We don't.
Re:Security by obscurity is underrated by kstrauser on Friday September 11, 2020 @07:30PM (#24448424)
I didn't take that away from the article at all. It said:

> So let’s talk about security by obscurity. It’s a bad idea to use it as a single layer of defense. If the attacker passes it, there is nothing else to protect you. But it’s actually would be good to use it as an “additional” layer of defense. Because it has a low implementation cost and it usually works well.

I think it's good to do those things in addition to the other stuff. Obscurity isn't sufficient by itself, but is another layer of defense.

Re:Security by obscurity is underrated by weare138 on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:24PM (#24449052)
In addition to the stuff you should really being doing? That stuff is hard enough for beginners, without confusing them with speculation like this that goes against best practices and common sense, especially without clearly explaining the pitfalls and real dangers to each of these hypothetical scenarios. Besides, if you're already using industry accepted solutions to security problems and someone manages to gain unauthorized access anyways don't expect any of this amateur crap to offer any real protection at that point.
Re:Security by obscurity is underrated by kstrauser on Saturday September 12, 2020 @01:14AM (#24450012)
I don’t feel as though you came away with the real intent of the article, which didn’t make the arguments you’re shouting down.