News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Security by obscurity is underrated by kstrauser on Friday September 11, 2020 @07:30PM (#24448424)
I didn't take that away from the article at all. It said:

> So let’s talk about security by obscurity. It’s a bad idea to use it as a single layer of defense. If the attacker passes it, there is nothing else to protect you. But it’s actually would be good to use it as an “additional” layer of defense. Because it has a low implementation cost and it usually works well.

I think it's good to do those things in addition to the other stuff. Obscurity isn't sufficient by itself, but is another layer of defense.

Re:Security by obscurity is underrated by weare138 on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:24PM (#24449052)
In addition to the stuff you should really being doing? That stuff is hard enough for beginners, without confusing them with speculation like this that goes against best practices and common sense, especially without clearly explaining the pitfalls and real dangers to each of these hypothetical scenarios. Besides, if you're already using industry accepted solutions to security problems and someone manages to gain unauthorized access anyways don't expect any of this amateur crap to offer any real protection at that point.
Re:Security by obscurity is underrated by kstrauser on Saturday September 12, 2020 @01:14AM (#24450012)
I don’t feel as though you came away with the real intent of the article, which didn’t make the arguments you’re shouting down.