News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why the Apple II Didn’t Support Lowercase Letters by modzu on Thursday September 10, 2020 @01:28PM (#24434542)
why do lower case letters even exist? in 100 years might they be done with?
Re:Why the Apple II Didn’t Support Lowercase Letters by bonzini on Thursday September 10, 2020 @02:05PM (#24434928)
Some argue that mixed case texts are more readable because the ascenders and descenders provide "synchronization points" for our eyes in scanning text. Also (and less controversially) uppercase is larger so it is slower to read it, because there are more pauses to move your eyes to the beginning of the next line.
Re:Why the Apple II Didn’t Support Lowercase Letters by ars on Thursday September 10, 2020 @08:06PM (#24437922)
There are plenty of languages without upper and lowercase, I've never heard of them being slower to read.
Re:Why the Apple II Didn’t Support Lowercase Letters by bonzini on Friday September 11, 2020 @02:08AM (#24439649)
Yes, that's why the first point is more controversial. But the second is interesting: alphabets that lack lowercase, like Korean hangul, have bigger characters but they pack more information into each of them.
Re:Why the Apple II Didn’t Support Lowercase Letters by modzu on Thursday September 10, 2020 @06:09PM (#24437072)
thanks for this. but c.f., javascript vs python syntax
Re:Why the Apple II Didn’t Support Lowercase Letters by kps on Thursday September 10, 2020 @02:24PM (#24435103)
Lower-case letters evolved from handwritten Roman letters. Upper-case is exactly carved Roman letters. Mixed-case comes from initials — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial
Re:Why the Apple II Didn’t Support Lowercase Letters by beckyb on Thursday September 10, 2020 @01:54PM (#24434814)
they are way easier to read than all uppercase.
Re:Why the Apple II Didn’t Support Lowercase Letters by modzu on Thursday September 10, 2020 @06:07PM (#24437049)
since the responses have mostly been literal (no pun intended) perhaps i should clarify, i meant "case" in general