Re:Sweden’s low positive test rate ‘vindicates coronavirus s...
by soco on Thursday September 10, 2020 @03:37AM
(#24429858)
Italy, Spain and Switzerland were hit when nobody even knew what the virus was. By the time politics started to put measures into place, deaths already were starting to pile up. Sweden and other nations had time to prepare some kind of strategy, so I would put that gained time into equation as well. That's why the comparison to the neighbours is more appropriate. Also, their neighbours will have also more similar social patterns - and it's exactly on the social patterns that the whose Swedish strategy was built. What works for Sweden doesn't for others: you can't compare the human interactions in Stockholm with the interactions in Mallorca, so how could you even think to compare their approaches?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sweden’s low positive test rate ‘vindicates coronavirus s...
by thu2111 on Thursday September 10, 2020 @01:55PM
(#24434818)
Switzerland? Deaths didn't "pile up" in Switzerland. Look at the excess death data. 2018 showed a bigger spike in deaths than 2020.
Sweden's strategy would have worked fine everywhere. Most deaths are in care homes, that general lockdowns don't protect, and anyway, remember that they were never advertised as reducing deaths? The virus just comes back when lockdowns are over, even if you assume they work.
Sweden is the winner of COVID, by far. It is indeed vindicated.