AT&T’s current 5G is slower than 4G in nearly every city tested by PCMag

Re:AT&T’s current 5G is slower than 4G in nearly every city ... by grishka on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @01:51PM (#24423717)

I live in a country that won't see 5G soon, if ever (that is, not in the US). My point is that the existing LTE networks are plenty fast for all intents and purposes. I don't always notice the difference even between 3G and 4G.

So, then, it comes naturally to ask what is the exact problem that 4G has but 5G aims to solve, besides all the marketing and change for its own sake. Especially that weird kind of 5G that can't go through your hand and has coverage area of a single tower smaller than that of a WiFi access point.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AT&T’s current 5G is slower than 4G in nearly every city ... by goihoiholi on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @02:30PM (#24424129)

actual development and standardization uses shorter cycles than the 5G hype cycle.

release 8 is slow. your phone would show 4G

release 14 is super fast. your phone would show 4G

release 15 will show 5G but it's just one iteration away from fast 4G.

it brings some cool techniques that boost efficiency (more people in the same cell can download things, increasing the average speed) -- and other stuff. peak download rate is one of the less interesting features, but most prominent.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AT&T’s current 5G is slower than 4G in nearly every city ... by MBCook on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @02:14PM (#24423983)

My understanding is there are two forms of 5G. One works like 4G but faster, and the other (millimeter wave) has the limitations you mentioned but crazy high bandwidth.

We’ll probably get a mix of the two deployed depending on topography, density, cost, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]