News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Read Fewer Books by rgoulter on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @05:40AM (#24419173)
"Sports is to war as pornography is to sex." — Jonathan Haidt
Re:Read Fewer Books by Cro_on on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @12:21PM (#24422614)
Except that the universal adoption of sports would result in a net positive. The same cannot be said for pornography.

Also it makes just as much sense like this: 'sports is to sex as pornography is to war.'

Re:Read Fewer Books by shoes_for_thee on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @01:12PM (#24423205)
It's easy to miss the point of any analogy if you try hard enough.
Re:Read Fewer Books by webmaven on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @10:14PM (#24428248)
> Except that the universal adoption of sports would result in a net positive. The same cannot be said for pornography.

By adoption of sports, do you mean universal participation or spectation?

The former I suppose would be a net positive, if you limit the requirement to just making sure everyone does at least some physical activity every day, but if you mean that everyone should be required to play some sport as a significant pastime the negatives start reducing the net positive.

If the latter, I must vehemently disagree. We would probably be better off banning spectator sports entirely rather than making everyone watch.

Re:Read Fewer Books by Cro_on on Thursday September 10, 2020 @09:08AM (#24431966)
Just a quick way to say that I think a little exercise goes a long way :)
Re:Read Fewer Books by RugnirViking on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @12:59PM (#24423050)
Presumably that is because war is bad and sex is not bad?
Re:Read Fewer Books by edgarvaldes on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @02:19PM (#24424035)
I think it referes to the spectactle aspect of sports