News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AMD PSB Vendor Locks EPYC CPUs for Enhanced Security at a Cost. Parent comment

Re:AMD PSB Vendor Locks EPYC CPUs for Enhanced Security at a... by boring_twenties on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @11:59PM (#24416950)
Cloud vendors should be using coreboot, not UEFI.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD PSB Vendor Locks EPYC CPUs for Enhanced Security at a... by octoberfranklin on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @05:30AM (#24419104)
Not sure why downvoted. I run blobless coreboot for precisely this reason. My only regret is not being able to find newer x86_64 gear that supports it. OTOH you can still buy in-production arm64 boxes that boot with zero blobs (RK3399).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD PSB Vendor Locks EPYC CPUs for Enhanced Security at a... by freeone3000 on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @01:27AM (#24417480)
One of the cloud vendors created UEFI.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD PSB Vendor Locks EPYC CPUs for Enhanced Security at a... by boring_twenties on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @01:29AM (#24417493)
Then they know full well how bad it is!

*Jokes aside, I think Intel created UEFI (for Itanium?), not Microsoft?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD PSB Vendor Locks EPYC CPUs for Enhanced Security at a... by freeone3000 on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @10:35AM (#24421455)
The consortium has AMD, Intel, and Microsoft listed as contributors, so even if they didn't initially create the thing, they had a hand in it. The executable format used for UEFI is PE, which is telling.
[ Parent | on HN ]