I posted my parent comment opportunistically, so I have yet to distill my reading into specific, well-formed questions. Is there any way I can message you when I get around to doing so?
In the meantime:
>There is one improvement that whyrusleeping from ipfs came up with which is to allow a small number of hash collisions in a level, before pushing things down a level.
How is this an improvement, exactly?
>How is this an improvement, exactly? This allows you to essentially make the tree "fatter" for a given bitwidth. This matters more in the ipfs setting because links are not memory pointers, but Merkle-links to objects which may be a network request away.
I've sent you an email with from my personal gmail account. I really appreciate the help, thanks!
[0] https://github.com/Peergos/Peergos/blob/master/src/peergos/s...