Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its...
by belltaco on Saturday September 05, 2020 @09:10PM
(#24388157)
Humans don't have LIDAR, they have only 2 eyes and not even radar. Yet they're able to drive pretty well, it's because they have great software to power that limited hardware.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its...
by throwaway4220 on Saturday September 05, 2020 @11:22PM
(#24388709)
Yes, but Tesla has a bunch of cameras not two human eyes.
Edit: I wonder if a human can learn to drive a Tesla remotely better than another human with radar and multiple camera input by representing them in some useful way.
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its...
by nradov on Saturday September 05, 2020 @11:33PM
(#24388758)
Remote operation is not yet a viable option for safely operating vehicles on most public roads. Our cellular data networks are simply too unreliable. What happens when a construction crew accidentally cuts the backhaul fiber for the closest base station? Or when the car is driving through a tunnel?
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its...
by 256lie on Sunday September 06, 2020 @12:27AM
(#24388967)
Humans can do a lot of other things such as hear car horns, reason about driver behavior, interpret road signs, and understand casuality of driving off a cliff.
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its...
by belltaco on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @01:01PM
(#24423074)
Exactly my point, this is a software limitation and not hardware.