Re:A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)
by Animats on Friday September 04, 2020 @02:32PM
(#24377626)
Some time ago, some UI designer asked, on HN, for what open source program should they build a UI to establish their reputation. I suggested "git". That was rejected as too hard. They just wanted to put eye candy on a command, not have to rethink its relationship with the user.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)
by cxr on Friday September 04, 2020 @04:03PM
(#24378401)
A few years back, a designer waded into the middle of the echochamber on some HN thread about inculcating people from other disciplines. They wrote that "as a designer" they did not consider Git (GitHub?) to be thoughtfully put together or well-suited for the kind of work they do or something like that. It was a short comment, about as long as that, and there was no flaw or faux pas or even anything incendiary about it. HN wasn't having it, though, and downvoted it mercilessly. (There were no responses to say why it had been downvoted; the subthread dead-ended there.) It's things like this that remind me of the now-infamous comment in the Dropbox thread.
I didn't think at the time to bookmark it with my "hn sucks" tag, and over the past year or two, I've tried several times to find it again, for reasons similar to[1], but I've been unable to.
Re:A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)
by barbarbar on Friday September 04, 2020 @03:28PM
(#24378121)
It was very good idea. Though perhaps establish reputation is probably not a good starting point.
Re:A Requiem for a Dying Operating System (1994)
by cercatrova on Saturday September 05, 2020 @04:36AM
(#24382248)
Well they were a UI designer and not a UX designer.