Re:Small nuclear reactors: tiny NuScale reactor gets safety ...
by asdfman123 on Thursday September 03, 2020 @05:55PM
(#24369329)
The article states the whole reactor will be submerged in a pool of water, making it passively safe.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Small nuclear reactors: tiny NuScale reactor gets safety ...
by meepmorp on Thursday September 03, 2020 @06:43PM
(#24369695)
Reactor cores continue to produce waste heat when shut down, and water evaporates. It’s passively safe till you run out of coolant, then it’s actively dangerous.
Re:Small nuclear reactors: tiny NuScale reactor gets safety ...
by ixfo on Thursday September 03, 2020 @07:03PM
(#24369837)
In this case the pool boils off slowly enough from thermal load to let decay heat reduce to the point where air cooling is adequate. So it remains passively safe unless there is a sudden loss of water from the pool.
Engineering a very resilient pond does not feel like as complex a problem as engineering highly complex cooling systems to be resilient.
Re:Small nuclear reactors: tiny NuScale reactor gets safety ...
by throwaway0a5e on Thursday September 03, 2020 @07:48PM
(#24370175)
And if you size the pool right it will by cool before the pool boils off. It's simple math and engineering.