Re:30-35 percent of Covid-19-positive Big Ten athletes had m...
by dvt on Thursday September 03, 2020 @05:16PM
(#24368983)
This is an atrocious, fan-flaming, scientifically-inept article written to solely get clicks. It's peak fearmongering.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:30-35 percent of Covid-19-positive Big Ten athletes had m...
by faitswulff on Thursday September 03, 2020 @09:33PM
(#24370896)
More of a Mayo Clinic person, eh?
> COVID-19 symptoms can sometimes persist for months. The virus can damage the lungs, heart and brain, which increases the risk of long-term health problems.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/i...
Re:30-35 percent of Covid-19-positive Big Ten athletes had m...
by dvt on Friday September 04, 2020 @01:49AM
(#24372095)
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2768351
N = 143
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6930e1.htm
N = 270
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/...
N = 100
The rest of the studies cited by Mayo are all in the same range, feel free to check. Mayo Clinic or not, you're seriously going to draw conclusions over this?
Re:30-35 percent of Covid-19-positive Big Ten athletes had m...
by faitswulff on Friday September 04, 2020 @06:53AM
(#24373788)
What, pray tell, does it take for something to be considered "scientific" in your mind? Those sample sizes are nothing to sneeze at for a brand new pandemic. And what conclusions do you think anyone is drawing other than "some percent of people are affected by covid for the long term?" Especially on the comments for a post detailing a significant percent of covid positive athletes being affected by myocarditis?