https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_Mountain_nuclear_waste...
The anti-waste-disposal crowd in the environmental movement feels exceedingly disingenuous.
The amount of goal post moving they've engaged in over the decades makes it clear that their actual goals are to prevent any waste disposal site from being constructed, rather than specific, actionable complaints.
Which is insane, from a net-benefit perspective, as the alternative is to leave nuclear waste dispersed around the country, closer to population centers.
It's a matter of political will at this point.
"Ensuring access to dedicated funding – Current federal budget rules and laws make it impossible for the nuclear waste program to have assured access to the fees being collected from nuclear utilities and ratepayers to finance the commercial share of the waste program’s expenses.
We have recommended a partial remedy that should be implemented promptly by the Administration, working with the relevant congressional committees and the Congressional Budget Office. A long-term remedy requires legislation to provide access to the Nuclear Waste Fund and fees independent of the annual appropriations process but subject to rigorous independent financial and managerial oversight."
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20120807061024/http://brc.gov/si...
We have no permanent disposal facilities, not even in the planning stage.
https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/disposal_of_highlevel_nuclear...