News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by baby on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:05PM (#24367537)
Do you realize the number of free services that one uses thanks to ads? Not everyone can afford to pay for these. I for one use gmail, google maps, google calendar, google docs, etc. Every day
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by legulere on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:10PM (#24367596)
Do you realize how much bullshit people buy that they do not need because of ads? People end up with much less money because of that. And the environment suffers too.

And no, without apps people would be able to discover new things. Current ads are not about facts but connecting feelings with products.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by sushid on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:20PM (#24367705)
It's not exactly like people weren't buying things before the internet. Hell, there's advertising on the walls of Pompeii. If anything, better advertising gets us to buy stupid shit people are actually more interested in than before.

At least we're not buying pet rocks now.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by legulere on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:36PM (#24367881)
Psychology and a normalization of false promises (thus far will make you a real man, this product will make you desired) only started around 1900.

The benign ads can still be seen in China when people write their service and a phone number on the wall, basically the only graffiti you will see there.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by newbie578 on Thursday September 03, 2020 @04:19PM (#24368424)
This has to be one of the most uninformed comments I have ever read on HN.

Are we seriously going to blame ads for people buying stuff they need? I mean come on, this seems like a South Park episode, the Ads are self-aware and made us do it.

Current ads are not about facts? Please do tell when was a time ads were not about trying to awake emotions inside prospective customers? Check out The 22 Irrefutable Laws of Marketing by Jack Trout and Al Ries, a book old almost 30 years yet still holds today. Marketing (offline or online ads, it's all the same basis) has and always will be part psychological.

I don't know for you, but I would rather appreciate an ad about something which I found useful (a sponsored job posting in my field of work on Instagram) than get a random ad like the early 2000s ("This russian young lady can't wait to meet you").

While we might not like or appreciate ads from a technical perspective, it is beneath a developer's pride we must come to terms that ads are what puts bread to our tables.

Innovation and progress, especially in the internet age has occured thanks to the business potential of marketing and ads.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by legulere on Friday September 04, 2020 @03:48PM (#24378300)
If ads would not make people buy things there would not be so much money in that business.

Ads started using psychology and emotions around 1900.

I would prefer a world without those ads. Here in Germany I even still have to endure ads for tobacco.

Ads would be completely unnecessary where I work, we have solely customers that pay a recurring fee.

The only innovation in advertising is about lying better to people and spy more on them. Ads have wasted so much potential of talented developers and creative people.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by filoleg on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:19PM (#24367702)
> Do you realize how much bullshit people buy that they do not need because of ads? People end up with much less money because of that.

Other people's issues with financial self-control isn't a solid basis for being against something. By that logic, alcohol, clothing stores, videogames, literally anything that might influence people to buy things they don't really need is bad.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by AlexandrB on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:39PM (#24367912)
There's a line where what you call "people's issues with financial self-control" becomes a societal/systemic problem. Alcohol and gambling are the classic examples where extra taxation and regulation like age restrictions come into play. Where is that line for general advertising? I don't know. But it's out there.

P.S. Speaking of videogames, I'm of the opinion that many mobile "gatcha" games should be regulated like gambling products. Hoping legislation catches up in this regard.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by legulere on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:40PM (#24367930)
Ads are manipulative. You do not choose ads but they are in your face. And since recently are completely violating our privacy.

Alcohol is rightfully regulated. Video games in their modern pay to win kind should be too.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by gowld on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:17PM (#24367672)
What is life without feelings ?
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by b1476 on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:09PM (#24367583)
There are plenty of free alternatives to Google that don’t rely on ads and respect your privacy.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by sujinge9 on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:12PM (#24367615)
What are some free products that don't rely on ads?
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by b1476 on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:26PM (#24367775)
Gmail -> ProtonMail free tier Google Maps -> Open Street Maps (although I personally use Ordnance Survey Maps) Google Docs -> I use LibreOffice because I don’t need the cloud functionality Google Calendar -> I currently use a Synology NAS to host my own but I’m eagerly awaiting the release of Proton Calendar

As a disclaimer to this I actually pay for ProtonMail and OSMaps because they’re products I use daily and feel that they deserve the money, however they do have free tiers and there are free alternatives to most Google software. I’d strongly suggest looking into de-Googling, there’s an entire subreddit dedicated to it.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by ogre_codes on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:45PM (#24368009)
Literally every service the previous poster mentioned has an ad free/ tracking free alternative which ships with the iPhone. Aside from that, there are too many "free products" without advertising to list them so you'd need to be more specific.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by asutekku on Thursday September 03, 2020 @04:09PM (#24368300)
They are not free, if you need to buy a phone to use them.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by ogre_codes on Thursday September 03, 2020 @04:57PM (#24368805)
> They are not free, if you need to buy a phone to use them.

If you don't have an iPhone/ iPad/ Mac, how else would Apple's privacy/ tracking policies apply to you?

We're talking about advertising and apps on iOS, those apps are absolutely free (and ad free) on any devices under discussion here. Otherwise, please feel free to ask about any other specific app on any other platform, because in almost all cases there is a free solution without advertising.

The idea that the world needs to run on advertising is nonsense. Likewise that developers/ end users somehow "need" advertising.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by read_if_gay_ on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:23PM (#24367744)
Most OSS I suppose.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by markyc on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:15PM (#24367651)
like what?
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by sosborn on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:13PM (#24367624)
Do you realize that you can have ads subsidizing free services without any tracking or using any third-party services?
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by amadeuspagel on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:23PM (#24367751)
Obviously, companies generally make more money with tracking, otherwise they wouldn't do it, and that means more investment in free services.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by njitram on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:18PM (#24367690)
Those types of ads definitely exist, but make a lot less revenue, which in the end impacts free services.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by mc32 on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:08PM (#24367568)
Sure, those people can “opt in” if they choose. The point is that it should default to not track unless the user knowingly and willingly chooses to be tracked (in exchange for services if you like).
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by ogre_codes on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:42PM (#24367962)
This is just letting people know that the apps which use the advertising are tracking them. If people don't mind getting tracked to fund their apps, they can opt in.

I don't have any trouble with advertising and tracking... so long as it's clear and obvious that it's happening and you have an easy way to opt out. This should make both sides happy.

Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by ocdtrekkie on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:11PM (#24367599)
The world would be arguably a better place if all of those services went dark tomorrow. Everything offered there can be done elsewhere by better products with less user harm, for free, today.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by amadeuspagel on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:30PM (#24367811)
Meaningless drivel. Billions of people rely on these free service, but in some unspecified place they could be done better, without some unspecified harm. OK.
Re:Apple to delay privacy change threatening Facebook, mobil... by bnj on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:15PM (#24367649)
Services should not be able to stalk my online activity indiscriminately without my knowledge and consent.