News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lunar – macOS utility to set brightness and volume on ext... by arghwhat on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @02:14PM (#24344906)
I suppose it's a type of problem that solves itself: If companies are dumb enough to store brightness settings in EEPROM, they're only doing it because no one uses DDC/CI.

Use DDC/CI, and they'll stop. Even NAND is wrong if brightness is actually dynamically controlled, it should just be RAM.

Re:Lunar – macOS utility to set brightness and volume on ext... by toomuchtodo on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @02:42PM (#24345264)
Ahh, but this information needs to make it to consumers so they don't get stuck with dud monitors that have internal storage that rapidly wears. How, as a consumer, do I know which monitors store settings in such a manner and therefore avoid them when making purchasing decisions? Perhaps Lunar and Flux could make monitor recommendations with affiliate links, Wirecutter style. I don't want to have to research, just tell me what works best so I can pull my credit card out.
Re:Lunar – macOS utility to set brightness and volume on ext... by arghwhat on Wednesday September 02, 2020 @05:20AM (#24351413)
You don't.

Such monitor recommendations could only be based on people tearing down things, which is outside the scope of Lunar and f.lux.

There is never a guarantee that you don't get stuck with a dud monitor, in any aspect. However, companies making products with bad reliability is going to face high support/warranty fulfillment costs and get a bad reputation. And if it fails within warranty/consumer protection periods, you lose nothing.

So, write away, and flood bad manufacturers in complaints. It's all you can do as a consumer - the alternative boing to get AMD, nVidia or Intel (or Displayport/HDMI interest forums) to be interested in making requirements against display manufacturers on the matter.