News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PNG and Hidden Pixels. Parent comment

Re:PNG and Hidden Pixels by Beldin on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @09:46AM (#24341649)
The "completely deniable" part is not necessary for steganography.

Otherwise, you dismiss just about any examples of steganography prior to steganography on computers.

Which is fine, but as far as i know, not the commonly accepted definition.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PNG and Hidden Pixels by chrisseaton on Tuesday September 01, 2020 @10:04AM (#24341800)
The question was

> so why bother

The answer is - because it's more deniable. You bother because more deniable is better.

[ Parent | on HN ]