[dead]
Re:Facebook’s ties to India’s ruling party complicate its fi...
by dang on Saturday August 29, 2020 @02:49PM
(#24318491)
"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."
Re:Facebook’s ties to India’s ruling party complicate its fi...
by commoner on Saturday August 29, 2020 @11:50AM
(#24316912)
Nobody made that claim. The article covers Facebook's repeated failure to promptly remove hate speech against Muslims in India, and that's why this topic is being discussed.
[dead]
Re:Facebook’s ties to India’s ruling party complicate its fi...
by commoner on Saturday August 29, 2020 @12:38PM
(#24317322)
Hate speech against women in India may also be an issue, but that's not what the article is about. The article focuses on hate speech on Facebook against Muslims in India.
Re:Facebook’s ties to India’s ruling party complicate its fi...
by srean on Saturday August 29, 2020 @01:44PM
(#24317914)
Independent citation needed.
Re:Facebook’s ties to India’s ruling party complicate its fi...
by thefounder on Saturday August 29, 2020 @01:54PM
(#24318031)
Re:Facebook’s ties to India’s ruling party complicate its fi...
by srean on Saturday August 29, 2020 @01:57PM
(#24318063)
It talks about the number of rapes reported daily in India and those numbers are utterly, distressingly and shamefully high. However, I don't see where it indicates hate speech against women in India is an equal if not a bigger issue.
I fail to see anything in that article about hate speech against women, violence against women sure, where does it talk about hate speech and how relevant is that to this HN post. Are you sure you did not get carried away by your personal agenda.