Re:Artificial-Intelligence Breakthrough? “The Neo-Darwinian ...
by dchacke on Sunday September 06, 2020 @04:35PM
(#24394445)
I'll respect your wish not to spend any more time on it, and will leave you with two closing comments:
1. Like I said, the article is aware of and addresses the tautological nature of neo-Darwinism generally.
2. The part you quoted is not useless because, if true, it refutes other (en-vogue but false) theories about "reasons for belief," such as higher/lower numeric credences, stronger neuronal connections, etc.
Because of your request, I skimmed through parts of the article again, and again only found tautology: "Why do some people believe some things over others? Because some ideas spread through their minds better than others."
I can not claim it is illogical, but because it is highly tautological, it is very useless, and I don't wish to spend any more of time on it.