News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Safari adopts the Chrome/Firefox extension model by rjmunro on Friday August 28, 2020 @08:42AM (#24304153)
Supports them by getting them banned from Ad networks, taking their revenue away? Or at the very least reducing ad conversions for their advertisers, meaning they become a less valuable place to advertise on.

What is "Dishonesty isn't really a topic if we are talking ads" supposed to mean?

Re:Safari adopts the Chrome/Firefox extension model by raxxorrax on Friday August 28, 2020 @08:58AM (#24304302)
Advertisers have zero scrutiny in tracking me and extracting as much personal info as they can, so accusations about dishonesty about faking an incentive to buy something doesn't really reach my conscience too much.

Do we have examples were sites were banned for this behavior? I think "click fraud" doesn't actually fit, since it is not the operator of the site who is responsible. I would be more open to call that behavior fraudulent. I mean cases where users fake their activity.

edit: And if true, why wouldn't I go to google.com and let it run there for a while? Just researched the Google really put effort in banning it.

Re:Safari adopts the Chrome/Firefox extension model by ffpip on Friday August 28, 2020 @09:15AM (#24304430)
Many sites were banned from running ads.

Google.com ads are search specific. They'll ban you first, before stopping ads.