Government has powers, not rights, and only those powers granted it by Federal/State constitutions.
People sometimes misstate the concept of limited Federal powers as "states' rights", but the term generally reflects ignorance.
- Trump wanted to run the Covid response. The states told him to get lost. (Was that good or bad? True, the Covid response has been disjointed, even incoherent. Would it have been more coherent if Trump ran it? Or less?)
- Trump wanted to send federal law enforcement into cities to control rioting. The cities told him no. (There were some federal agents in Portland against the will of the city; the legal scope of their activity was protecting federal property.)
The deal is that we have a limited federal government. They don't get all the power. They get the power the constitution says they get. The states (or the people) get the rest. And they're pretty touchy about protecting that power.
Is it useful? It is if you want to keep having a limited federal government. Arguably, we need (and needed) far more than we have had.
Are there actually valid useful reasons for the concept or is it time to ask what purpose they serve?