News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The potentially revolutionary Celera 500L aircraft by sirk1882 on Thursday August 27, 2020 @01:37AM (#24290460)
Which is why companies like this are going to be doing what Musk is doing with Electric vehicles.

Now, if they could make these for 2000-3000km flights and they ran on 250kWh to 350kWh electric they'd be what the future entails. Especially if they weren't piloted and were fully automated.

Re:The potentially revolutionary Celera 500L aircraft by ppf on Thursday August 27, 2020 @04:47AM (#24291415)
Removing your energy source (fossil fuel) and replacing with energy storage doesn't fix anything - where does the energy to fill that storage come from? In some hypothetical future where renewable energy is very cheap, it will still be more efficient to use that energy to produce liquid fuel for planes.
Re:The potentially revolutionary Celera 500L aircraft by sirk1882 on Thursday August 27, 2020 @07:05PM (#24299668)
ITER. Tritium breeding reactors by feeding it recycled lithium.
Re:The potentially revolutionary Celera 500L aircraft by ppf on Friday August 28, 2020 @01:48AM (#24301718)
Exactly. IMHO nuclear is the only way, if we go down this path. And if we do that, then we mostly don't need to bother with wind/solar/grid storage.
Re:The potentially revolutionary Celera 500L aircraft by jacobwilliamroy on Thursday August 27, 2020 @01:39AM (#24290467)
Did you hear what I said about COVID? Also your imaginary battery that doesn't exist, is imaginary, and doesn't exist. Unless you want to fly around on a nuke.

And can we stop giving elon musk credit for everything? Tesla employs 48,000 people and contracts god only knows how many. It's pretty clear that elon musk is stealing credit for everyone's work, and Im sure the rest of the company physically cringes whenever people say stuff like "Elon is doing great stuff with batteries"

Re:The potentially revolutionary Celera 500L aircraft by sirk1882 on Thursday August 27, 2020 @07:05PM (#24299663)
Eh, kleenex, scotties, brand name recognition is a trite point.

And when it comes to EV batteries, Tesla is leading the field. 21700 batteries are a smart improvement over 18650 cells.

And I'll happily give the engineers at Tesla credit. However, realistically speaking they should be branching out and applying the same technology elsewhere. Especially in regard to hybrid vehicles.

It's not an either/or situation. We can eat our cake and drive it halfway too.