News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Please read the paper before you comment by Cthulhu_ on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @03:49AM (#24269026)
Yeah I heard about that one I think, that's really clever. Honestly comment sections on the internet are a cesspool on the best days, but comment sections under news articles? It makes all the undereducated conspiracists come out the woodworks. A Dutch news site (nu.nl) tried to run a comment section and even something of a social network for a while, but they couldn't maintain them.

You can create a comment section, but it needs a barrier like that and tight curation - no comments posted without approval. Which can be a problem because the commenters with "dissenting" opinions will quickly claim censorship and how the outlet doesn't tolerate opposing viewpoints.

Re:Please read the paper before you comment by skrebbel on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @04:38AM (#24269293)
> Honestly comment sections on the internet are a cesspool

A bit offtopic, but when YouTube first added comments, they quickly got into cesspool territory, exactly like you describe. However, these days, I find myself really enjoying YouTube comments quite often. Is this just me? Am I just watching more happy happy joy joy videos these days or did YT comments go from "the internet's awfulest" to "pretty neat" somehow? I feel like it's chock full of witty jokes, positive vibes, light entertainment, and the occasional weirdo just to balance things out.

Re:Please read the paper before you comment by 52-6F-62 on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @07:43AM (#24270333)
I’ve noticed this in the comments under music more than elsewhere. Anything politics is still awful.

Music is nice and largely even positive—if repetitive (“anyone here listening to [90s band] in 2020??”)

Re:Please read the paper before you comment by strogonoff on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @10:17AM (#24271559)
Don’t forget countless horrific things content moderators have to read and see so that you can enjoy your experience.
Re:Please read the paper before you comment by skrebbel on Wednesday August 26, 2020 @04:28AM (#24280380)
We couldn't do without the epsilons.
Re:Please read the paper before you comment by thinkloop on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @05:10AM (#24269448)
It might have to do with there being real identities linked to them now from Google+, which many say was the main purpose of the project; not to mention the improved recommendation engine and upvotes, etc.
Re:Please read the paper before you comment by freeflight on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @11:47AM (#24272545)
Looking at Facebook I would be willing to say that has literally nothing to do with it.

Facebook insists even more on having "real people" using their real names, often forcing them to vet themselves, yet at times it easily steals the crown in terms of "really bad user interactions" from YouTube comments.

Very likely much more related to the topic under which people are commenting: Non-political feel good fluff does not allow for much friction to be inserted, thus the tone of comments will be much more civilized and friendly.

But anything that goes into controversial, and particularly political, territory is bound to quickly escalate into a complete shit show, on YouTube and Facebook alike.

Which fits neatly into common communication strategies like focusing on similarities rather than on differences.

Re:Please read the paper before you comment by webmaven on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @08:52AM (#24270782)
> It might have to do with there being real identities linked to them now from Google+, which many say was the main purpose of the project; not to mention the improved recommendation engine and upvotes, etc.

But the migration of YouTube channels and comments to G+ linked identities was reversed[0], wasn't it? Not to mention that G+ has since been shut down.

Shouldn't that make the abortive effort irrelevant for the quality of YouTube comments today?

[0] https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/everything-in-its-ri...

Re:Please read the paper before you comment by TT3351 on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @09:26PM (#24278114)
I think Google works really hard to surface comments that they know a user will interact with.
Re:Please read the paper before you comment by skrebbel on Wednesday August 26, 2020 @04:28AM (#24280378)
That would work best if they'd surface all the vitriol, right? People love to interact with vitriol.
Re:Please read the paper before you comment by Scarblac on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @04:17AM (#24269191)
Nu.nl's comment section has been back for a while, they dumped the social network ambitions and invested in better moderation before turning it back on. It's helped somewhat.
Re:Please read the paper before you comment by commandlinefan on Tuesday August 25, 2020 @10:07AM (#24271468)
> no comments posted without approval

This is a popular opinion - that there are some things that people should just not be allowed to say, anywhere, ever, and while I (sort of) understand the impetus behind it, every proposed cure is worse than the disease.